7 Key Differences between Popular Books and Their Film Adaptations ...


When comparing popular books and their film adaptations, it will be next to impossible to not spot the differences between the two. As a book aficionado, it's sometimes hard trying to ignore any changes, minor or major, made in the final cut of the film; when it leans on the drastic side of the spectrum, this can either hurt the movie or help distinguish the film from the franchise it is based on. Keeping this major spoiler warning in mind, here are a few books and their film adaptations that are known for the vast changes made.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

Please subscribe for your personalized newsletter:


The Hunger Games

As far as famous books and their film adaptations go, The Hunger Games series has been criticized for the important details cut out, which inadvertently warped the history. To be specific, I know that I don't speak alone in saying that making the decision to strip away the meaning of the mockingjay pin and its origin by eradicating the background story behind how Katniss got it was very upsetting. While I love The Hunger Games franchise (both the films and books as a whole), I feel that this move changed certain dynamics.


The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

While I loved the sequel, I have to admit that I wish that Haymitch's back story was more developed in the movie franchise. While his depiction as a clever alcoholic fits in with the tune of the book, a large part of what makes him who he is has yet to be delved into. I really wanted to see how they would handle showing the inner workings of why he is the way he is (from his time in the Hunger Games arena to being the victor of the Quarter Quell).



While many may be more inclined to disagree, I felt that the director's choice to tone down the scene in which Al who, after betraying her and teaming up Peter and the rest of his crew, tries to kill heroine Tris was a sound one. In the novel, there were more serious and vile connotations about where the situation was headed.


The Lord of the Rings Series

While it's understandable that screen time has to be taken into consideration, it seemed as if there were more changes (characters as well as themes) made to the film than not. I don't think I can ever get over the fact that in the film, Glorfindel and Tom Bombadil were completely erased from the history of Tolkien's book.


The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones

The powerful Hodge's many tricks aren't as widely explored in the film. If you hadn't read the book before catching the film, you may not have known that one of the ways that Hodge always managed to be one step ahead of everyone was that he enlisted the help of his bird Hugo and his cat Church to spy on everyone.

Famous Quotes

Happiness depends upon ourselves.


The Vampire Academy

I still wonder why the scene where Lissa witnesses blood donors being abused was left out. This was actually one of the moments in the book that helped paint her character in full. It's possible that the director wanted to avoid making the film as dark as the book and therefore sought to get rid of any instances that showcased her emotional issues.


Ender's Game

Lastly, Ender's Game took a page out of the aforementioned film's book by completely erasing the lead character's penchant for violence and revenge. In the book, Ender Wiggin actually ends up killing Stilson and Bonzo after being bullied by them. In the film, this was left out.

That being said, one can say that all of the differences cataloged give the films a chance to exist as their own entities. It's up to you to decide whether they enhanced your experience. Did you find yourself loving or hating any of the changes made to the books mentioned above? Which film do you feel stayed truest to the text it was based on?

Feedback Junction

Where Thoughts and Opinions Converge

Divergent was bad. Its so empty in plot in comparison to the book. Theres nothing to the movie, if youve read the book it's just plain bad. So much is left out or skipped over and not enough is given to the depth of the characters relationships and the story itself. WHAT WAS THE ENDING?

city of bones was so different from the book they may as well be separate stories. and hodge never used Church as a spy, only the bird. on the topic of divergent, I think the downplayed all the secondary characters in general. it definitely took away from the overall quality of the movies

Why is the app suddenly cutting off in the middle of sentences? I don't know if I'm the only one but I would like to read the whole article!

why did they write about the typical "teen" books, I wanted to hear about the help, or the minority report...*yawn*

i was just about to say the same thing that Savanna said. It's annoying that those sentences just cuts on middle.

The biggest difference I noticed in city of bones was that the battle took place in the institute but that didn't happen in the book. In the book, it wouldn't even be possible for the battle to be in the institute.

same here! it is cutting off the sentences

The biggest disappointment of the lotr movies was the ending!! We were robbed of fabulous original ending :-(

Related Topics

9 Amazing Short Books Anyone Can Find the Time to Read ... 9 Amazing Beach Reads to Devour This Summer ... 7 Books That Should Be Turned into Movies ... book baby dentist visit charles dickens movie adaptations 7 Classic Just so Stories to Read to Your Children ... 7 Quirky Literature Inspired Items Bibliophiles Must See ... 7 Books to Put on Your 2014 Summer Reading List ... 7 of the Best Books of 2014 so Far ... 7 Top Book Releases for the Summer ...

Popular Now