Yea, yeaβ¦ βeveryoneβs a critic.β But today, in this exact moment, the only critic is me. So listen up, people, because Iβve got some opinionated shit to say! Here's my honest review of the movie "When We First Met".
Now, Iβm sure Iβm not the only person who's been paying attention to the diminishing cable and film industries. It seems the modern era is more obsessed with Netflix originals than the silver screen. Which is somewhat ironic considering straight-to-DVD releases, and TV movies, used to be a sign of lesser products. Not anymore, my friendsβ¦well, letβs not get ahead of ourselves.
Netflix has released tremendous, Emmy-nominated shows such as Stranger Things and Black Mirror. And Netflix's rise to fame doesnβt look like itβs going anywhere anytime soon. However, it also has some whoppers that would be straight-to-DVDs had they been released ten years prior. Iβm referring to the buttload of rom-coms that seem to infect the browser. Maybe youβve heard of them?
Iβm not complaining. Please, donβt take my honesty and criticism as a βcomplaint;β Iβm merely pointing out some things that youβre probably (or maybe notβ¦ I donβt know your life) already thinking.
Iβll start by commending Netflix on its trailers and advertisements. As soon as I log into my Netflix (well, my Firestick remembers me; Netflix is pretty popular in my single-millennial-woman household), there is always an original at the top: PLAY ME! PLAY ME! Watch my trailer! Ahh, you got me Netflix! Because I am an ADHD member of this wonderful (ignore the sarcasm) generation, I run out of things to watch and click the first thing that looks somewhat entertaining.
Tonight, like most nights, I opened Netflix and didnβt want to re-watch 'Friends' reruns for theβ¦ummβ¦one-hundredth time. So instead, I sat idly by as the top ad played its trailer. And what Netflix original might my eyes have been dazzled with? Pitch Perfectβs Adam DeVineβs film: 'When We First Met.'
Although Iβm often a cynic, I too enjoy a good old-fashioned romance. Especially one that mimics some of my favorite movies: Groundhog Day and Back to the Future (though I wouldn't necessarily say these films are "chick-flicks". But hey, I guess DeVine is trying to make his own chick-flick rendition of them!) So, here's my review of the movie "When We First Met".
If you havenβt seen 'When We First Met,' let me give you a quick synopsis: boy (DeVine) meets girl (Alexandra Daddario). Then, said girl βfriend-zonesβ guy. Three years later, girl gets engaged to a dreamy stud and the friend-zoned guy daydreams of when he first met (so that's why they call it that...) the girl he missed his chance with. Keeping things fresh, the film adapts a time-traveling plot, shouting out to 'Back to the Future' with Huey Lewis tunes. But the film is more of a modern 'Groundhog Day' with a twist: the protagonist goes back to time through a photo booth, reliving the day he met his βdream girl,β over and over again, and each time wakes up three years from then, forced to live with the consequences of whatever he changed by going into the past.
There ya have it (donβt worry; I wonβt spoil anything). Now, it is a pretty iconic plot. Who doesnβt love a time travel film, am I right? But the film seems to fall flat on a couple levels. For starters, the film takes place in New Orleans 2017, but it looks more like a Northern college town. With a city as diverse and eccentric as the Crescent City, one would think that such a flavor would be brought out. Wrong. Instead, the film acts as though the cityβs gentrification is at an ultimate high: all white millennials wearing outfits sorority girls of the Midwest would be caught wearing. Itβs as if the producers decided βletβs make a movie that takes place in New Orleans,β then neglected that choice, and put in random cuts to trollies and the Mississippi River. Oh, and the main characters love jazz (Iβll give them that one; yes, New Orleans loves its jazz), but the setting is nothing but a setting. And to me, a place as charming as New Orleans cannot be merely the setting of a film; New Orleans is its own character.
I was, however, entertained from start to finish. But I would have liked to see more fleshed out characters. Perhaps I saw a glimmer of who the protagonist was. But his love interest, his friends, her friendsβ¦they were flat. I never understand why he loved this girl so much. And with all the focus on DeVine, it made it harder to root for a character who seems narcissistically involved in his own happily-ever-after.
Albeit, itβs a simple rom-com; how much can we really ask for? And even a cynical snob like me will admit that the ending brought out a hopeless-romantic awwwww. Then again, what rom-com wouldnβt?
In the end, Iβd recommend this film if youβre bored on Netflix, looking for a modern spin on time-travel with a goofy, somewhat dick-ish male protagonist to center a formulaic plot (*cough* Bill Murray *cough* βI think Iβm a God, Ritaβ). Iβm not here to say this movie is awful because itβs not. Like I said: entertaining! It has its moments (though not many laughs) and paces itself well enough to stay focused for an hour and a half. But if youβre looking for a movie that isnβt stealing all its tricks from the β80s, or want something whose setting matches reality, maybe stick with 'Friends' reruns.



Feedback Junction
Where Thoughts and Opinions Converge
2018-03-11T15:04:28.246Z